By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Go Vocal as an alternative to PublicInput? Compare the platforms
By
Sören Fillet
March 1, 2024
10 minutes
You’ve likely come across PublicInput through a webinar, a colleague’s suggestion, or a quick online search. At first glance, their platform may seem like a good option for online participation or community engagement. But could there be something out there that better aligns with your specific needs?
Table of contents
With heightened community expectations and the rising importance of community engagement in legislation, choosing the right community engagement platform is crucial.
Your engagement platform should reflect the unique needs and priorities of your community. Whether you want to streamline processes, increase participation rates, or foster collaboration, Go Vocal is here to help.
Let’s explore how Go Vocal compares to PublicInput and why we believe our community engagement platform will make all the difference for your government agency.
PublicInput vs. Go Vocal: main differences
Transactional vs. broad, deep engagement
PublicInput provides a solid starting point for governments' journey into digital engagement. Their platform combines entry-level engagement and communication tools across several modules, including Engage, Meetings, Contact, and CRM. This suite offers basic functionality to reach and gather input from residents through methods like surveys, web pages, emails, texts, voicemails, and meeting facilitation.
At Go Vocal, we’ve chosen a different path. Rather than being a “jack of all trades”, we’ve focused on building a comprehensive engagement platform that empowers meaningful participation at scale. Our approach is to understand and meet the growing needs of local governments and their communities.
Many communities find that over-reliance on surveys leads to diminishing participation, for instance. That’s why Go Vocal offers advanced tools for deeper engagement, such as Voting and Prioritization, a built-in Participatory Budgeting tool, and Document Annotation features, ensuring residents are heard and actively involved in shaping outcomes.
Functional basics vs. thoughtfully designed for UX and elevated engagement
PublicInput provides tools to help local governments manage engagement projects, offering features like data sharing and reporting dashboards. These tools are designed to help teams access insights efficiently and streamline some aspects of their workflows. However, during our research, engagement teams have reported the need to rely on external tools for advanced reporting, task management, and other critical functions.
Tailored for teams of all sizes: Go Vocal offers role-based access and permissions, ensuring every team member — from small local teams to multi-department city staff — has the tools they need while maintaining control and security.
Enhanced design and customization options: Projects can be tailored with custom layouts, branding, and features, allowing government agencies to align their engagement efforts with their identity and goals.
User-centric back-end UX: Intuitive design makes navigation and setup simple, reducing onboarding time and allowing teams to focus on what matters most — community engagement.
Tech support vs. a partner in participation
Although PublicInput and Go Vocal both make engagement more efficient, you’ll still sometimes get stuck.
At such moments, it is helpful to be able to count on support. And that is slightly different for both companies.
A dedicated Government Success Manager who brings expertise in digital democracies and participatory practices.
Access to a global network of participation practitioners for shared learning.
Thought leadership resources and practical tools like ebooks, guides, and webinars.
Responsive tech support with average response times of just 1-3 business hours.
Which types of organizations are PublicInput and Go Vocal best suited for?
PublicInput is an excellent option for local governments new to community engagement or aiming to integrate basic participation with communication strategies. Their platform emphasizes beginner-friendly techniques, such as surveys, websites, and meeting facilitation, making it perfect for those exploring engagement for the first time.
Go Vocal, on the other hand, caters to communities that are already connecting with their residents or looking to initiate engagement with the goal of elevating their efforts. Offering tools that cover the entire IAP2 spectrum — from Inform to Empower — and ensure smooth project management, Go Vocal supports both straightforward projects and complex, multi-year initiatives that can help develop transformative policies and foster lasting cultures of engagement.
Features of PublicInput and Go Vocal: a deeper look
Engage
While PublicInput’s platform offers entry-level engagement and communications tools, Go Vocal is a more robust engagement toolbox. Especially as you progress on your engagement journey, your needs evolve beyond surveys and information and, instead, benefit from broader and deeper engagement methods.
Manage
Effective project management involves more than enhancing communication and data sharing; it focuses on equipping your team with essential tools for seamless collaboration, managing intricate workflows, and responding to community feedback.
PublicInput is dedicated to dismantling data-sharing barriers, enabling teams to access insights more efficiently for better decision-making. This focus on making data accessible and applicable is essential for fostering collaboration within organizations and enhancing the effectiveness of engagement efforts.
Custom roles and permissions: Assign specific roles to team members, ensuring the right people can access the right tools and data.
Task assignment: Easily delegate tasks to colleagues, such as following up on feedback, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks.
Internal commenting: Collaborate directly within the platform by adding internal comments to feedback.
Decide
PublicInput provides a variety of reporting and analytic tools designed to help teams interpret community feedback. Their GPT Comment Analysis Tool simplifies the sorting and tagging of resident responses with just a few clicks, making it easier to understand feedback.
Additionally, their built-in dashboards offer a clear data overview, while Equity Mapping enables users to import custom GIS layers for analysis and equitable decision-making.
At Go Vocal, we also focus on making data analysis user-friendly and impactful. Similar to PublicInput, we provide built-in dashboards and a robust AI analysis tool, Sensemaking, that efficiently sorts and tags feedback based on sentiment, themes, or any other categorization of your choice.
However, we further enhance this experience with automatic summaries of community input with our Sensemaking feature and the capability to ask specific questions, allowing teams to explore insights more thoroughly and uncover actionable recommendations.
To encourage transparency and closing the feedback loop, Go Vocal offers a custom report builder that simplifies insight sharing. Reports can be effortlessly shared within your organization or published directly to the project page with a single click — keeping participants informed and engaged.
Is Go Vocal a good alternative to PublicInput?
While PublicInput offers a good platform and unique features, we believe Go Vocal is a more sustainable option and the most comprehensive and user-friendly tool out there.
Our pricing ensures that you’re not paying for enterprise-level features you won’t use, nor will you outgrow the platform.
Sören Fillet is Go-to-Market Lead at Go Vocal and holds a master’s degree in public sector communications.
With 5+ years of experience in GovTech, Sören has developed a nuanced perspective on the challenges and best practices in democratic participation. He actively collaborates with experts in the field to organize industry events and stay at the forefront of trends and innovation.
In addition, Sören obtained a certificate from Innovation in Politics, further solidifying his expertise in innovative governance.
Sören is a fervent tech enthusiast with a profound interest in politics and democratic innovation.He aims to share stories that inspire and drive impactful community engagement.
Sören Fillet is Go-to-Market Lead at Go Vocal and holds a master’s degree in public sector communications.
With 5+ years of experience in GovTech, Sören has developed a nuanced perspective on the challenges and best practices in democratic participation. He actively collaborates with experts in the field to organize industry events and stay at the forefront of trends and innovation.
In addition, Sören obtained a certificate from Innovation in Politics, further solidifying his expertise in innovative governance.
Sören is a fervent tech enthusiast with a profound interest in politics and democratic innovation.He aims to share stories that inspire and drive impactful community engagement.
,
Other Blog posts
Product Updates
By
Diana Martín
August 25, 2026
What's new on Go Vocal: reach more residents, run participation your way, and prove your results
Six updates, built around three things municipalities keep asking for: reaching more residents, running participation the way your community actually needs it, and results you can stand behind. Here's a look at what's changing.
Beyond online and offline: building listening infrastructure for hybrid participation
Public participation has never had more channels. Yet many governments still struggle to build a complete picture of what their communities are saying. This article explores why the future of participation isn't about choosing between online and offline engagement, but about connecting them through a shared listening infrastructure.
Mayor Danene Sorace joins Go Vocal as Senior Strategic Advisor
Building effective engagement tools is half the problem. Building a city where tools drive real change is the harder half. Lancaster, Pennsylvania, accomplished this over the past eight years, and the mayor who led that work is now on our team.