Project time
Year
Problem
The People Powered Places programme is the London Borough of Newham’s flagship programme of participatory budgeting. It started in 2018 with the aim of delivering the Mayor of Newham’s aspiration to create a culture of participation in the area, with the aim of increasing transparency and trust in local government, and including local people into the decision-making process.
Between 2021 – 2023, £1.6 million from the Neighbourhood Community Infrastructure levy has led to investment in 157 local projects. The People Powered Places programme stands out as one of the UK’s most extensive local participatory budgeting initiatives.
Newham Co-create, the borough’s CitizenLab-powered engagement platform, has been a vital tool in facilitating resident interaction with the Community Assemblies programme. It served as the stage for a whopping 16,552 resident engagements between 2021 and 2023, representing a remarkable increase from the 3,147 engagements in the 2018-2020 cycle.
Amelie Pollet, Participatory Democracy Coordinator at London Borough of Newham, explains: “One of the CitizenLab’s platform core strengths lies in its strong and extensive information-sharing capabilities. Residents can learn about the People Powered Places initiative, access minutes of working group meetings, watch uploaded videos, and see upcoming events.”
The platform goes beyond just providing information; it actively keeps residents engaged in the People Powered Places’ progress. Residents can stay informed about the overall timeline, discover upcoming events and key dates.
Amelie further highlighted the platform’s polling and participatory budgeting features, sharing that “The dedicated participatory budgeting module enables residents to easily allocate funds through a budget simulator and prioritise local projects. In addition, the ability for residents to comment on the ideas and start a discussion has sparked lively conversations and fostered a collaborative spirit.”
Example of a poll – Residents were asked to vote on the top 3 priorities for their neighbourhood
Example of the budget allocation process – Residents could pick the projects they think are most relevant to implement
Newham’s team, always striving for improvement, initiated a thorough evaluation of the programme’s cycles between 2021-2023. They used a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods to gain a robust understanding of the programme’s effectiveness and impact.
In the words of Amelie, “To gain a rich and in-depth understanding, we conducted, among others, a series of focus groups. These involved residents who have been actively engaged in various aspects of the assemblies, working group members, and project leads across both the current and previous cycles. In addition, we sent out surveys to all users of Newham Co-create who participated in the 2022 voting phase and had participants in the in-person events fill out feedback forms.”
The Newham engagement team scored the programme on seven success criteria:
How better to measure the impact of a programme than by looking at how residents feel about their involvement in local decisions?
The figures below show that a majority of residents involved have a positive perception of the programme. For residents involved in 2022/2023:
Amelie reflected on the results, sharing that “it is great to see the majority of residents have such a positive perception. From the number of resident contributions, it is also clear that People Powered Places is widening participation; the number has significantly increased since the first cycle of the programme. On the other hand, our evaluation shows that, to date, those taking part in the programme are not yet fully reflective of Newham’s diverse population.”
In this comprehensive review, the Newham Co-create platform was also evaluated for its role in facilitating robust resident engagement.
The platform was seen as a useful tool by both Council staff and residents. Users praised the platform for its ability to consolidate information, foster connections, and reach a broader audience. The majority found the platform easy to access and understand, especially in terms of voting for projects.
Based on the evaluation, Newham formulated seven recommendations to improve the current 2023/2025 and upcoming cycles. We’ll highlight three, but you can read all seven recommendations in the full evaluation report.
“One of the main challenges we’ve faced with the Community Assembly programme is the time crunch within a one-year cycle,” explains Amelie. “We’ve found that the existing cycle doesn’t provide ample time for projects to get delivered as effectively as we’d like.”
Amelie continues, “We’ve extended the cycle from one to two years. A two-year cycle will afford us the opportunity to plan more effectively for the long term and ensure smoother project implementation processes. This extended timeframe will also stimulate increased collaboration between Council services.”
“With this extension,” she elaborates, “we’ll be dedicating the first year to deliberation, project application, and voting. In the second year, we’ll focus on project delivery and evaluation.”
“Another aspect we’ve realised needs some attention is our communication,” admits Amelie. “Since the programme’s inception in 2018, it has evolved tremendously. However, residents who participated in the initial cycle might not be fully aware of these improvements. There’s also been some confusion about the programme being a citizens’ assembly process, which it isn’t, given that we don’t rely on sortition and our processes extend beyond just recommendation to actual project delivery by the residents.”
“To address these issues,” she continues, “we’re transforming our communication around the programme to raise the residents’ awareness and understanding, and clarify how they can get involved.”
“One of the improvements is introducing a dedicated brand for the programme, People Powered Places,” Amelie reveals. “This branding will make it easier for residents to recognise funded projects and avoid further confusion with citizens’ assemblies, a separate initiative run by Newham Council. It better encapsulates the essence of the programme, emphasising the fact that it’s about action and project delivery by residents. To further inspire participation, we’ll also focus on project case studies which vividly illustrate the impact of the programme.”
“Thirdly, we acknowledge that our voting process needs some adjustments,” Amelie shares. “We’ve heard from some residents that they would prefer the option to vote for their favourite projects offline.”
“To ensure we’re providing an accessible and inclusive process, we are planning on extending opportunities for in-person voting in each neighbourhood by organising buzzing voting events alongside online voting,” she continues. “The CitizenLab team has already worked with us to make the ‘shopping basket’ system more intuitive and we plan to incorporate ballot boxes at our in-person events. We believe that by doing this, we’ll cater to all preferences, allowing everyone to participate in shaping their community, irrespective of their digital literacy or access. We worked with CitizenLab’s product team to be able to avoid community members voting multiple times by adding the option to ask specific questions, like the postal address, in particular phases of the engagement process. We really appreciate CitizenLab’s openness and swift response to product feedback.”
The People Powered Places programme in the London Borough of Newham represents an impressive example of participatory democracy in action. With the support of CitizenLab’s platform, the programme has made significant strides in enhancing transparency, fostering a sense of community, and empowering residents. As we move forward, the lessons learned and the feedback from this evaluation will serve as a valuable guide in refining both the platform and the programme.
Interested to discover how your local authority can leverage our platform and enhance community engagement? Talk to us!
Sören is a fervent tech enthusiast with a profound interest in politics and democratic innovation.He aims to share stories that inspire and drive impactful community engagement.
After seven years of using the same systems, the London Borough of Southwark conducted a technical audit to see if their digital engagement was at the cutting edge. After a detailed procurement process, Go Vocal came out on top. With benefits like AI analysis, built-in reporting, and all the tools for the job in one place, the intuitive platform has improved their efficiency almost twofold.
When the London Borough of Lambeth reviewed its community engagement practices, they identified a critical challenge: fragmentation. Teams across the council were using multiple tools without a central system to coordinate efforts or share insights. After carefully evaluating their options, Lambeth switched to Go Vocal, a decision that has already proven beneficial for their small but dedicated team.
Newham recently evaluated their Community Assemblies initiative, now known as People Powered Places. This article outlines a summary of the report’s key insights and ideas for future improvement. Read on to kindle fresh ideas for invigorating engagement within your own community!
