By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
How much does a community engagement platform cost?
By
Sören Fillet
February 15, 2023
6 minutes
When it comes to community engagement, most governments’ first concerns are the associated costs. Large-scale projects involving thousands of people must be incredibly costly, right? Well… not always. An online community engagement platform can drastically reduce the cost of participation. Let’s dive deeper into the investment and what you get in return.
Table of contents
The obscure cost of traditional channels
Town hall meetings are as old as democracy itself. They’re the traditional way to capture feedback and give community members a say in local policy decisions – however, they’re also a costly and time-consuming process. Town hall meetings take time to organise, often have additional costs related to refreshments and venues, require on-site staff, and have to be repeated throughout different phases of the project. Input collected during these meetings is difficult to process and share throughout an administration. What’s more, only a handful of residents attend the meetings, meaning the input isn’t representative of the wider population’s concerns.
With participant recruitment, organisation, staff involvement, transportation, etc., costs can easily go up to $200 per engaged resident. And if only a handful of people show up, can you really consider that a worthwhile investment?
An online engagement platform reduces the cost of engagement drastically
An increasing number of governments are turning to online platforms to engage their residents. And rightly so: leveraging technology enables you to engage your community at scale, at a fraction of the costs of traditional channels.
Here are three reasons why an online engagement platform is worth the investment:
1. Engage up to 12x more residents on average
With the addition of digital engagement, governments see – on average – a 12x increase in resident engagement if the same amount of time and resources are allocated towards a good combination of online and offline vs. only in-person public consultation.
Why? Because through online community engagement, you enable more people to have their say, at their convenience. You’re allowing them to share their views in their own time, wherever they are.
2. You build a network to re-engage in just a few clicks
As you bring more consultations online, you build a database of participants that can be re-engaged easily on future projects – without additional investment.
Each consecutive engagement requires fewer resources on marketing and outreach because you have a network of community members willing to engage, and they know they can find all engagement projects on your centralised online platform. Or, you can spend resources in a more targeted way, and do outreach to groups that do not engage (sufficiently) with you yet.
3. Scaling engagement, not costs
In contrast to when you only focus on offline engagement methods, the cost isn’t increasing when you run more projects or reach more people. For example, when you need to organise more offline events, costs quickly increase. Think about the extra costs for:
Food and drinks,
Preparing for the event,
Fees for consultants to moderate offline town halls,
Personnel costs to staff events.
In contrast, the cost per additional online project is marginal. If you opt for a platform license with Go Vocal, you can launch as many projects as you want, without any additional cost.
There’s a cost to a lack of community engagement
Moreover, it’s essential to remember that a lack of engagement can come at a much greater cost than investing in a good process, supported by the right tool.
Including residents in decision-making means that you can base decisions on reliable information. You get a better understanding of what your community needs, and are able to allocate resources accordingly. And the more residents you engage, the more you can rest assured that your decision is the right one.
Not consulting (enough) residents can lead to making unnecessary investments, not being able to check whether there is enough support for a particular decision, and/or failing to address the most pressing issues – with dissatisfaction as a consequence. This can lead to you having to reconsider your choices and plans.
Investing in online community engagement = funds well spent
It’s clear that adding online participation to your engagement toolbox positively impacts the number of participants and, ultimately, your return on investment. But apart from higher participation numbers, a good online engagement platform will also help you run projects more efficiently and better leverage the input you collect.
Want to learn more? Download your copy of our guide "The ROI of online community engagement".
By
Sören Fillet
Sören Fillet is Go-to-Market Lead at Go Vocal and holds a master’s degree in public sector communications.
With 5+ years of experience in GovTech, Sören has developed a nuanced perspective on the challenges and best practices in democratic participation. He actively collaborates with experts in the field to organize industry events and stay at the forefront of trends and innovation.
In addition, Sören obtained a certificate from Innovation in Politics, further solidifying his expertise in innovative governance.
Sören is a fervent tech enthusiast with a profound interest in politics and democratic innovation.He aims to share stories that inspire and drive impactful community engagement.
Sören Fillet is Go-to-Market Lead at Go Vocal and holds a master’s degree in public sector communications.
With 5+ years of experience in GovTech, Sören has developed a nuanced perspective on the challenges and best practices in democratic participation. He actively collaborates with experts in the field to organize industry events and stay at the forefront of trends and innovation.
In addition, Sören obtained a certificate from Innovation in Politics, further solidifying his expertise in innovative governance.
Sören is a fervent tech enthusiast with a profound interest in politics and democratic innovation.He aims to share stories that inspire and drive impactful community engagement.
,
Other Blog posts
Strategy & Budgeting
By
Wietse Van Ransbeeck
October 29, 2026
Participation without policy is a microphone nobody plugged in
Governments have become very good at engaging residents. Yet much of that participation never reaches the decisions leaders care about most. So how can policy and participation reinforce each other?
Fit for planning reform: ten ways to meet the new plan-making requirements
Plan-making now runs on a 30-month clock, with three consultations and three gateway checks along the way. These ten Go Vocal capabilities help planning authorities engage positively, move quickly and get it right first time.
Planning for Pride in Place? Four examples of community engagement in local funding
Giving residents a say in local funding starts with being clear about what they can influence. From public votes in Newham to playground design in Wigan, four examples offer practical lessons on setting clear rules, sharing decisions and keeping communities involved, with ideas for councils preparing for Pride in Place.